This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[ping] residual TImode patch PR28617

    Can you respond on Geoff's query about the residual sections of
the patch to fix PR28617 going into gcc trunk. The patch in question
is only...

Index: gcc/config/rs6000/t-darwin
--- gcc/config/rs6000/t-darwin	(revision 116801)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/t-darwin	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 LIB2FUNCS_EXTRA = $(srcdir)/config/rs6000/darwin-tramp.asm \
+	$(srcdir)/config/rs6000/ppc64-fp.c \
+	$(srcdir)/config/darwin-64.c \
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h	(revision 116801)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h	(working copy)
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
 #ifdef IN_LIBGCC2
 /* For libgcc2 we make sure this is a compile time constant */
-#if defined (__64BIT__) || defined (__powerpc64__)
+#if defined (__64BIT__) || defined (__powerpc64__) || defined (__ppc64__)
 #define TARGET_POWERPC64	1
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/ppc64-fp.c
--- gcc/config/rs6000/ppc64-fp.c	(revision 116801)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/ppc64-fp.c	(working copy)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING.  I
 Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
 02110-1301, USA.  */
-#if defined(__powerpc64__) || defined (__64BIT__)
+#if defined(__powerpc64__) || defined (__64BIT__) || defined(__ppc64__)
 #define TMODES
 #include "config/fp-bit.h"

Geoff question was...

>On 12/09/2006, at 1:24 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

>> Geoff,
>>    I noticed you felt comfortable checking in the large
>> DWARF file name handling speedup patch. Might you reconsider
>> the residual parts of the PR28617 TImode patch?
>The DWARF patch differed in three ways:
>- I'd had several months experience with it in the Apple compiler
>- it had no known bugs
>- it was a speed improvement, and thus counts as a regression fix
>However, if Mark's comfortable with adding this new feature at this  
>point in the release cycle (and possibly needing to fix problems with  
>it later), then I'm happy to put it in.

Thanks in advance for a decision on this.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]