This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/29024


On 9/25/06, Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com> wrote:
Lee Millward wrote:
> On 9/25/06, Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com> wrote:
>> Lee Millward wrote:
>> > This bug is an accepts valid where the presence of a storage class
>> > specifier in a typedef declaration wasn't being diagnosed. The
>> > testcase taken from the PR is:
>> >
>> > typedef static int a;
>> >
>> > which with current mainline is silently accepted. Whilst looking at
>> > this I noticed the following two testcases are accepted when they
>> > should be rejected:
>> >
>> > typedef register int b;
>> > typedef extern int c;
>>
>> Also 'typedef auto int d;', etc.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>
> That was already rejected before my patch. I included in the testcase
> all those which should be rejected, but previously wasn't, which is
> why there isn't a "typedef auto int foo;" in there.

4.1.1 doesn't reject it.

Try this:

int
f()
{
  typedef auto int a;
}

Andrew


Hmm, it may have been the testcase I used to for this wasn't totally accurate then but my patch will pick up this case and reject it like the others.

Cheers,
Lee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]