Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/29024

[Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>]

Lee Millward wrote:
> On 9/25/06, Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com> wrote:
> > Lee Millward wrote:
> > > This bug is an accepts valid where the presence of a storage class
> > > specifier in a typedef declaration wasn't being diagnosed. The
> > > testcase taken from the PR is:
> > >
> > > typedef static int a;
> > >
> > > which with current mainline is silently accepted. Whilst looking at
> > > this I noticed the following two testcases are accepted when they
> > > should be rejected:
> > >
> > > typedef register int b;
> > > typedef extern int c;
> >
> > Also 'typedef auto int d;', etc.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> That was already rejected before my patch. I included in the testcase
> all those which should be rejected, but previously wasn't, which is
> why there isn't a "typedef auto int foo;" in there.

4.1.1 doesn't reject it.

Try this:

int
f()
{
  typedef auto int a;
}

Andrew