This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
On 19 Sep 2006 19:13:29 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
>Gennaro Prota <email@example.com> writes:
>| I, for one, gave up making a proposal for dynamic_bitset, as I think
>| that with the current interface it was an experiment that failed.
I'm not sure how to interpret this. I choose not to submit something
which is (in my opinion, of course) flawed in many respects. Are you
implying it would have still been better than nothing?
>The C++ standards process is democratic and bureaucratic,
Yes, I didn't mean to imply otherwise.
>and only the
>small amount of resources donated by volunteers makes it progress.
>Whether that is good or bad, I don't know. But, I very much prefer it
>to the fast track stuff MS has been using to push things forward.
Aha. Is _that_ the obscure force behind the push for the x=9 in C++0x?
>Here is a list of what the EWG being working on so far
Yeah. The list is both pleasant and impressive :-) We all have to
thank God for having such a wonderful language and active top-notch
community around it.