This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: how can I add gcc backend code into GCC package


>>>>> liqin  writes:

liqin> I mean the different between  "\;" and ";"  in the output template, thank 
liqin> you very much, and we had fixed it in the code.

	This looks much better.

liqin> As you say, we will try soft-fp, and use it test our testsuite. 
liqin> But it's maybe need some time, Can you kindly let us do it later? If 
liqin> soft-fp is really well, I think we certainly use it in our code.

	I think this is a communication misunderstanding.  You do not need
to switch to soft-fp immediately to have the port accepted.  Your comment
in the previous message, "And because we need more time to use hand-coded
assembly routines to replace fp-bit.c," implied that you already had
decided to use hand-coded assembly.

	The latest version of the patch should be okay for inclusion in
GCC, but someone with GWP authority, such as Mark Mitchell, formally needs
to approve it.

Thanks, David


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]