This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR C++/28989, post-increment of bool is wrongly considered a lvalue

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:33:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR C++/28989, post-increment of bool is wrongly considered a lvalue
References: <1158196935.1000.17.camel@celery.andrew.com> <1158200628.1000.19.camel@celery.andrew.com> <450F04A5.2060008@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 13:42 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> Does it work to make lvaluep look through SAVE_EXPRs to the thing
> saved, 
> instead?
> 

No, because we want to reject this as an lvalue and the thing saved is
just a decl.  Maybe we should reject SAVE_EXPRs as non-lvalues but I
need to make sure again we are not stripping the SAVE_EXPR which I think
we are for some reason.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR C++/28989, post-increment of bool is wrongly considered a lvalue
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR C++/28989, post-increment of bool is wrongly considered a lvalue
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR C++/28989, post-increment of bool is wrongly considered a lvalue
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]