This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] require sse3 for fisttp
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 21:41 -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
A -mno-fisttp would be fine, however, it doesn't address the issue I'm
trying to solve in the patch. Your perception of Intel's incompetence is
Not if he wanted all of the processor features as well.
Like SSE3? Or fisttp? Well make a no-fisttp instead. fisttp
should not be linked to SSE3, just because Intel decided to rename PNI
to SEE3 without taking into account that fisttp does not touch any SSE
You still haven't addressed the issue of "it is considered an sse3
instruction in that the processor will fault". Until you do, please
refrain from arguing this more.