This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Test failure fix for IA64 HP-UX, does it count as a regression?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: sje at cup dot hp dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:42:34 -0700
Subject: Re: Test failure fix for IA64 HP-UX, does it count as a regression?
References: <200609131818.LAA24868@hpsje.cup.hp.com>

Steve Ellcey wrote:

When PR 27748 was fixed some new tests were added, including
g++.dg/cpp/_Pragma1.C and gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma6.c.  These tests fail on
IA64 HP-UX because that platform does not define
HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP.  There does not seem to be any reason why
IA64 HP-UX does not define HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP so this patch
fixes the failures by defining HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP.

It has been tested with no regressions, my question is, does this count
as a regression fix that can be checked in?

This isn't quite a regression, but it's OK to check this in.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

References:
- Test failure fix for IA64 HP-UX, does it count as a regression?
  - From: Steve Ellcey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]