This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [lto]: PATCH: Add output of functions.
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, "Berlin, Daniel" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Edelsohn, David" <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, drow at false dot org
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:09:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: [lto]: PATCH: Add output of functions.
- References: <45007C7D.email@example.com> <45018D60.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Friday 08 September 2006 22:21, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Friday 08 September 2006 17:33, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > As we've discussed, CONST_DECLs should be replaced with their
> > DECL_INITIAL values. That can happen in the gimplifier, or in your
> > code, but there's no need to worry about how to write them out and
> > there's no need to ever create a CONST_DECL in the reader.
> I wasn't in that discussion so ignore me if the point is moot, but...
> How are you going to handle addressable CONST_DECLs? The Fortran
> front end (and probably other front ends) use such CONST_DECLs to
> pass constants by reference. Seems to me you can't replace those
> with their DECL_INITIAL, and that you have to be able to write 'em
> out and read 'em back in...?
I hear this has already been discussed at length, so ignore me :-)