This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix libgomp Fortran tests

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:53:54PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
The attached patch fixes 2 problems in the libgomp testsuite.
The Fortran tried to use the most negative integer value, but
this cause an overflow because gfortran creates this value via a unary minus operation.

--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/reduction4.f90	(revision 116723)
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/reduction4.f90	(working copy)
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
  ka = Z'05a5a5'
  v = .false.
  cnt = -1
-  x = Z'ffffffff'
+  x = - huge(x) - 1

This can't be right. The test really needs an integer with all bits set, -huge(x) - 1 is Z'80000000'. That's what the OpenMP standard mandates that iand reduction var should be initialized to.

Indeed. This should be x=-1. Or, possibly more clearly, x=not(0).

(The BOZ-literal here is indeed wrong, but for a different reason; I believe the official gfortran understanding is that such literals are taken to be a _positive_ integer of the highest available precision, and then type-cast upon assignment just like any other expression, so nominally this is equivalent to x = 4294967295 and as such is illegal due to integer overflow.)

- Brooks

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]