This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28908 - [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: THOMAS Paul Richard 169137 <Paul dot Richard dot THOMAS at cea dot fr>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:14:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28908 - [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator
References: <1299EF3181B10F479D85C3280132852435AF3A@THEZE.intra.cea.fr> <20060904235233.GA24728@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve,

I've read HJ's reply in bugzilla about success with SPEC. I'm reporting that my f90 codes also all pass at least compilation testing. If you're still awake, I think you should commit this patch.

Thanks. I am even reconciled to this way of doing the association... still, a symtree might be an idea.... tomorrow!

Paul

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR28908 - [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator
  - From: THOMAS Paul Richard 169137
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28908 - [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]