This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Start to use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR more and start to fix PR 26069


On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 21:20 -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I agree that (2) is worthwhile since V_C_E on the LHS is peculiar.  However,
> I don't understand the reference to being marked addressable.  There's no
> reason to mark the operand of V_C_E as addressable.  In no way do we take
> a pointer that can be used elsewhere.  And the only time we're going to be
> forcing it into memory is in the BLKmode case, when it's already in memory.

Because that is a documented requirement in tree.def and also if it is
not marked as addressable, you get an ICE.

-- Pinski


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]