Re: [patch] fix wrong gimple code with ptr to forward vla

[kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)]

> What is?  VLA isn't, it's in C99.  The use as the type of a member is  
> an extension,
> but it's not documented to work; all the examples in the manual use  
> variables.
> If people agree this ought to work, that's fine, of course (though  
> maybe it should be so documented).

If it isn't "supposed" to work, all this means is that there's no
way to reproduce it in C, just in Ada.  Is that better?  I don't
understand why the question of whether the test program is correct
or not is particularly relevant here.