This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR27529, a step towards fixing PR27039
Andrew Haley <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Me either. However, there is some remarkably similar code in
That code is also bogus in the current regime and should be
represented using different tree codes or using some sort of flag on
the tree. (LVALUE_EXPR, maybe?)
It does seem like a new tree code is the right approach.
For the moment, if it helps, I'll approve your patch to go onto the
4.2 branch, when it is created. The patch shouldn't go into mainline.