This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
4.2 regressions with patch available
- From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 10:17:24 +0200
- Subject: 4.2 regressions with patch available
I went through the patch queue, and added the "patch" keyword to bugs
that have a patch available. Danny, maybe you could have the patch
application do so and add the patch URL in the bugzilla "URL" field?
Anyway, the results are as follows: these bugs have patches awaiting for
review:
26969 nor P1 NEW [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with -O1
-funswitch-loops -ftree...
27184 cri P1 pinskia@gcc.gnu.org ASSI [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
Wrong code with pointers to arra...
27735 nor P1 rakdver@gcc.gnu.org ASSI [4.2 Regression] ice with
-O3 on legal code [unswitch]
14435 nor P2 NEW [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gnatchop cannot use the
compiled...
23868 nor P2 NEW [4.1/4.2 regression] builtin_apply uses wrong
mode for mu...
26195 nor P2 i686-pc-linux-gnu NEW [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression]
pragma interface no longer handl...
26197 nor P2 NEW [4.2 regression] ICE in is_old_name with vectorizer
27721 min P2 reichelt@gcc.gnu.org UNCO [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE
using += with a function
27827 nor P2 bonzini@gnu.org ASSI [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc 4
produces worse x87 code on...
27880 nor P2 NEW [4.2 regression] undefined reference to
`_Unwind_GetIPInfo'
28606 nor P3 reichelt@gcc.gnu.org UNCO [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression]
Destructor accepted as return-ty...
23104 nor P4 pinskia@gcc.gnu.org ASSI [4.1/4.2 Regression] C does
not reject the same function ...
28136 nor P4 reichelt@gcc.gnu.org UNCO [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression]
ICE with incomplete array type
28284 nor P4 UNCO [4.2 regression] ICE with invalid static const
variable
28419 min P4 hubicka@gcc.gnu.org ASSI [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE
using __FUNCTION__ in invalid code
28593 nor P4 reichelt@gcc.gnu.org UNCO [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression]
ICE on invalid operator new
23709 min P5 pinskia@gcc.gnu.org ASSI [4.1/4.2 Regression] error
recovery is not smart enough
Reviewers, have fun. :-)
Paolo