This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:04:00 -0700
Subject: Re: header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies
References: <tkrat.bc44475558b34e4b@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> <44C80F6E.7030606@codesourcery.com> <tkrat.32f66cf486270367@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>

Volker Reichelt wrote:

> Paolo Bonzini and Andreas Schwab pointed out that I don't have to move
> the definitions of SYSTEM_H and VARRAY_H. I also bootstrapped and
> regtested a version that incorporates this suggestion.
> 
> Which version would you prefer?

I don't think it makes much of a difference, but it's always best to
change as little as necessary, all things equal.  So, let's go with the
version that doesn't move the definitions.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies
  - From: Volker Reichelt

References:
- header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies
  - From: Volker Reichelt
- Re: header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: header.h vs. HEADER_H in dependencies
  - From: Volker Reichelt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]