Re: [Fwd: Question on PR25289] Latest patch attached

[Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>]

Ouch.  See comment below.

>  > Index: libgfortran/libgfortran.h
>  > ===================================================================
>  > *** libgfortran/libgfortran.h    (revision 115168)
>  > --- libgfortran/libgfortran.h    (working copy)
>  > *************** Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.  */
>  > *** 56,62 ****
>  > --- 56,69 ----
>  >   #if HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
>  >   #include <sys/types.h>
>  >   #endif
>  > +
>  > + #if defined (HAVE_GFC_INTEGER_8)
>  > + typedef GFC_INTEGER_8 gfc_offset;
>  > + #elseif (HAVE_GFC_INTEGER_4)
>  > + typedef GFC_INTEGER_4 gfc_offset;
>  > + #else
>  >   typedef off_t gfc_offset;
>  > + #endif

In all my tests, this was defaulting to off_t because HAVE_GFC_INTEGER_8 and 
HAVE_GFC_INTEGER_4 are not defined yet at this point in the code.  They are 
defined in kinds.h which is included farther down in this file.  Discovered when 
I took the fallback condition out and I got a bootstrap failure.

So I am fixing this now and re-bootstrapping.  Another good example of why 
reviews are so helpful.

Sorry for all the gyrations on this.

Jerry