This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

testcase cleanup

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:48:01 -0700
Subject: testcase cleanup

In:

2006-07-17 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@st.com>

        PR other/28251
        gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c: New test.
        gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.x: New driver.

test cases were added that don't have enough detail to be unique or pin point which part of the testsuite is responsible for them.

This patch fixes:

PASS: -O0  dump-noaddr.c.001t.tu comparison
PASS: -O0  dump-noaddr.c.003t.original comparison
PASS: -O0  dump-noaddr.c.004t.gimple comparison

to be:

PASS: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.001t.tu, -O0 comparison PASS: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.003t.original, -O0 comparison PASS: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.004t.gimple, -O0 comparison

instead. This better matches the existing style:

PASS: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c, -O0 -DMASK=2 -x c -da - fdump-tree-all -fdump-noaddr

People can weigh in if they think this is obvious if they'd like... normally I'd consider it obvious.

Ok?

Attachment: tc-1.diffs.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: testcase cleanup
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]