This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Java Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:55:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
References: <44B71F98.9020705@redhat.com> <20060714075908.GM32572@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <44B7C075.20707@redhat.com> <20060714161118.GR32572@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <44B7C41F.9070003@redhat.com> <20060714164905.GT32572@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0 has that DT_NEEDED, but not libgcj_bc.so.

OK, I understand. I'm trying this now.

Bryce

References:
- [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [java] RFC/RFA: libgcj_bc.so.1
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]