This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Mark __asm__ identifiers as referenced in varasm.c


On Jul 6, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I saw this problem too and submitted a different patch. I got no comments
on it.

People might be worried that it breaks things. For example, I do wonder if it might break darwin. Not obvious that it won't. I examined this as far as I could, and from what I can tell, it appears to be ok, both in the spirit of things such as they are and ports like darwin. I think I like your patch over Roger's patch. I think you patch should be approved unless someone can show/explain why it is wrong.


The ordering was set in:

r7651 | kenner | 1994-07-04 18:54:39 -0700 (Mon, 04 Jul 1994) | 2 lines

(assemble_name): Call STRIP_NAME_ENCODING.

Maybe Kenner can chime in on the order chosen.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]