This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Implement -fstack-usage


Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> writes:

> > Why do we require targetm.get_static_stack_usage to be defined?
> > Clearly it's necessary for precise results.  But we can get pretty
> > good results just by calling get_frame_size.  Is there any reason to
> > enforce this restriction?
> 
> Define "pretty good results".  Do not forget that the goal is to give a 
> conservative estimate in all cases.

It seems to me that a conservative default would be get_frame_size
plus the sizes of all the live callee saved hard registers plus some
slop.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]