This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Whilst I was invesitigating how the two functions in question came to be called with NULL to respond to Andrew's mail I saw some other possible approaches to fix this which hopefully will be more acceptable that my original patch.
Cheers, Lee.
Lee Millward wrote:
> @@ -1442,6 +1442,9 @@ decay_conversion (tree exp) > tree type; > enum tree_code code; > > + if(!exp) > + return error_mark_node;
We should never be passing NULL to decay_conversion or initialize_artificial_var. Something further up the chain is causing the problem.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |