This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:51:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
References: <446B7341.3010400@codesourcery.com> <200605172101.k4HL13728910@makai.watson.ibm.com> <446B9150.1040704@codesourcery.com> <20060517225840.GA28930@lucon.org> <63212DA7-209F-4020-B707-ED83705F97C8@physics.uc.edu> <20060518025709.GA30447@lucon.org> <24007519-5341-4C42-9A43-3353A866979B@physics.uc.edu> <20060518054233.GA31183@lucon.org> <36E430BD-CE0D-46FB-9960-FEB385B80B35@physics.uc.edu> <446C17C3.6000307@codesourcery.com>

On May 17, 2006, at 11:44 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

How does PowerPC communicate 32-bit vs. 64-bit mode to the assembler and other tools?


well for one, it creates two different versions of ASM_SPEC.
One for defaulting to 32bit and one for defaulting to 64bit.
Which is what x86 really should be doing anyways.  In fact the only
reason why %{m64:--64} was added was to support that.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [Fwd: [Bug bootstrap/27644] [4.1 regression] Bootstrap failure on native ARM targets]
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]