On Monday 15 May 2006 18:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote on 05/05/06 05:10:
>
> > PR tree-optimization/23744
> > * tree-vrp.c (vrp_meet): do not require ranges to intersect.
> >
> This will be more appropriate for the next stage 1. In the meantime, I
> would like to see compile time impact analysis on real code (I can help
> out with the usual suspects I have around: cc1-i-files, DLV, MICO, SPEC,
> etc).
>
> You are lengthening the simulation by slowing down the decay into
> VR_VARYING.
You are correct, this may be a problem. I will try to do some benchmarking,
but it may take a few days. In the meantime, Richard Guenther has kindly
agreed run the patch through his C++ tester.