This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Fix the failures created by fix for PR 27144
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:00:35 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix the failures created by fix for PR 27144
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> * tree.c (unsigned_type_for, signed_type_for): Make sure a type
> of the correct signedness is returned.
This is OK for mainline, to get things working again. I think it might
be a good idea to also test your loop patches against fortran and ada
from now on.
Is there a strong reason to have unsigned_type_for and signed_type_for,
when lang_hooks.types.unsigned_type and lang_hooks.types.signed_type
would appear to be sufficient?
Roger
--