This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
References: <20060422230847.GA24692@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604230042210.19510@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20060423011204.GA25364@lucon.org>

On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, H. J. Lu wrote:

> > options in common.opt is intended to mean that each such option overrides 
> > any of the others, that needs to be explained in the documentation.
> 
> Are you saying -gdwarf-2 doesn't override the previous -gstabs
> and -gstabs+ currently?

I'm saying that if, for example, the transitive closure of "Negative" 
relations is taken, the documentation in options.texi should say so.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: PATCH: driver/26885: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates 32-bit object
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]