This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: {PING] [PATCH] Sign extension elimination

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
To: Mircea Namolaru <NAMOLARU at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, leehod at gmail dot com, leehod dot baruch at weizmann dot ac dot il, mark at codesourcery dot com, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:06:34 +0200
Subject: Re: {PING] [PATCH] Sign extension elimination
References: <20113297.1145187283040.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>

Mircea Namolaru wrote:

> I wrote:

>> Mircea wrote:

Changes in infrastructure of gcc that can be reviewed
and commitated separately were moved in separate patches.
See:
[PATCH} Extension to web.c
[PATCH] New function in cfgrtl.c
submittated before this patch.
meant that I *didn't* have to include it. If that's necessary, please point me to the message containing those updates.


No, You have to include these patches as well. Initially they were part of
the original patch, but to easy the review they were submitted separately.
Sorry if this was confusing.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01992.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01993.html

OK, that seems to go much better. I still don't understand how they could be "commit[..]ted separately, though.

Thanks,

--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
My next laptop will be pedal-powered

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]