This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:39:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
References: <200604050237.k352bL2I022741@greed.delorie.com> <20060410231937.GA8815@us.ibm.com>

> Do you mean for tests of functionality that ought to be supported
> for the target?

No, for things that aren't supported by the target, when lack of
support causes cascading failures.

> A test should be skipped if the functionality is not supported for
> the target, or xfail'ed if it demonstrates a known bug.

I must be out of touch then.  I thought XFAIL was for "we expect this
test to fail because the target can't support it".  Are we now using
UNSUPPORTED for this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: Janis Johnson

References:
- [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]