This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] 4.1 ivopts bug
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:37:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] 4.1 ivopts bug
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0603310644460.7096-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <442D5955.2030304@codesourcery.com> <200604010141.03963.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 17:31, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Roger Sayle wrote:
>>> I suspect Mark's decision would be easier if you also bootstrapped
>>> and regression tested your patch on one or two primary platforms.
>> That was in fact going to be my request. If I get to pick, IA32/x86_64
>> should be one, and something RISCy for the other; SPARC, PowerPC,
>> Itanium, MIPS, etc. If a bootstrap is inconvenient, a cross-compiler
>> and regression-testing in simulation would work for me.
>>
>> I'm inclined to take the patch, given that wrong-code bugs are bad, and
>> wrong-code bugs in SPEC are worse, given how many people evaluate by
>> running SPEC, but I do want to be cautious, given the size of the patch.
>
> I've bootstrapped and regression tested on i686-linux, x86_64-linux and
> powerpc-linux.
>
> Ok to apply?
Yes, thanks.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713