This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ Visibility regressions

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:38:58 -0500
Subject: Re: C++ Visibility regressions
References: <200603221612.k2MGCQD33816@makai.watson.ibm.com>

David Edelsohn wrote:

	The recent visibility patches have introduced numerous regressions
on AIX.  Source code that does not explicitly reference visibility should
not generate warnings on targets without visibility support.  The
namespace testcases should not have to be protected by "supports
visibility".

Details, please. Which testcases are failing? Is this just a problem with use of anonymous namespaces? What is the warning you are getting?

Jason

References:
- C++ Visibility regressions
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]