Re: [Patch] Add option to reduce amount of reflection data to gcj...

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> [Some nitpicking from a Texinfo newbie and enthusiast.]
>
> David Daney wrote:
>
> > +@item -freduced-reflection
>
>
> The rest of the options in this list also do not follow this,
> but still: Shouldn't this be "@item @option{-freduced-reflection}"
> instead?
>
>
>
> > +For code that does not use reflection (i.e. the methods in the
> > +@code{java.lang.reflect} package), @code{-freduced-reflection}
> > +will result in proper operation with a savings in executable code size.
> > +
> > +JNI (@code{-fjni}) and the binary compatibility ABI
> > +(@code{-findirect-dispatch}) do not work properly without full
> > +reflection meta-data.  Because of this, it is an error to use these options
> > +with @code{-freduced-reflection}.
>
>
> "@option{-fjni}" instead of "@code{-fjni}",
> "@option{-findirect-dispatch}" instead of "@code{-findirect-dispatch}",
> etc.

Well I would say in theory, you are correct.  However I think it is best 
to commit it as is because the rest of the file uses similar style.

Then there should probably be a follow on patch to use @option{} in the 
proper places in the entire file.

David Daney.