This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove LABEL_NEXTREF

From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:19:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LABEL_NEXTREF
References: <200603111402.24572.steven@gcc.gnu.org>

Steven Bosscher wrote:

Hi,

My recent patch to sh.c has made LABEL_NEXTREF unused.  The patch
below removes it.  Bootstrapped&tested on x86_64-linux and also
built&tested on sh-elf.  OK?

Seems to qualify as obvious.

Now that LABEL_REF has only a single field, I'm wondering, should
LABEL_REF be removed?  Could things that now take a LABEL_REF as
an operand just refer to a CODE_LABEL instead?

What about LABEL_REF_NONLOCAL_P?

Bernd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove LABEL_NEXTREF
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- [PATCH] Remove LABEL_NEXTREF
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]