This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[wwwdocs] committed simtest.howto.html: there's no sh-hms-sim; there's sh-hms and sh-sim.
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:46:03 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: [wwwdocs] committed simtest.howto.html: there's no sh-hms-sim; there's sh-hms and sh-sim.
There's no baseboard file named sh-hms-sim.exp so these were
just wrong; you get an error message. Thanks to stevenb for
spotting. Maybe the sh-coff test-target should use sh-sim too
(which is the one I use at times), but maybe not, better stick
with the intended one; sh-sim.exp is new while sh-hms.exp is
contemporary with sh-coff. (I need to rearrange that table;
prune and make subcategories and stuff like that. I really
really don't think there's a testable sparc-elf+sparc-sim.)
Committed.
Index: simtest-howto.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/simtest-howto.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -p -u -r1.23 simtest-howto.html
--- simtest-howto.html 26 Feb 2006 14:40:24 -0000 1.23
+++ simtest-howto.html 26 Feb 2006 21:34:39 -0000
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_boa
<tr valign="top">
<td>sh-coff</td>
- <td>sh-hms-sim</td>
+ <td>sh-hms</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-05/msg00622.html";>3.3 20030509 (prerelease)</a>
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_boa
<tr valign="top">
<td>sh-elf</td>
- <td>sh-hms-sim</td>
+ <td>sh-sim</td>
<td>big endian</td>
<td>
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/msg00315.html";>3.4 20030605 (experimental)</a>
brgds, H-P