This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR26406, forwprop causing VRP to fail

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:52:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR26406, forwprop causing VRP to fail
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602221404220.7478@t148.fhfr.qr> <1140621983.1915.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Feb 22, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

No.  We don't want to restrict things in this way.  I'm pretty
sure there's a better way to handle this.  Please be patient as
I'm more focused on the compilation regressions right now rather
than the minor optimization regressions.


I don't know how minor missed optimization this regression is really.
As it does show up a lot in C++ code with inlining on.  In fact I found
it while looking at tramp3d's generated code.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR26406, forwprop causing VRP to fail
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR26406, forwprop causing VRP to fail
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]