This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:49:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)
References: <20060217110104.GZ24295@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20060219174803.GH24295@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <43F8CBF6.4020206@codesourcery.com>

> I think the latter would be better; on some platform, there might be a
> register named "cc" that would be a valid choice, and then the test
> would FAIL there.

Yep, for example SPARC. :-)  Why not simply use a totally odd name for the 
register?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (4.1 regression, PR middle-end/26334)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]