This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H. J. Lu)
- Cc: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, thomas dot koenig at online dot de (Thomas Koenig), grigory_zagorodnev at linux dot intel dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:15:29 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:07:41PM +0100, Tobias.Schlueter@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE wrote:
> > Quoting "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>:
> > > I still see many Fortran failures on ia64 and x86-64:
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00773.html
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00774.html
> >
> > Those failures are then not related to Thomas' patch, but to the gomp merge
> > instead :-)
> >
>
> i686 is OK:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00774.html
>
> But -m32 failed on x86-64. It may be builtin function related.
Can you give the backtrace at where the Fortran testcase is failing?
I bet it is GC related.
-- Pinski