This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH - darwin] PR target/25376


On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:12:30AM -0800, Josh Conner wrote:
> I see your point, although I can't say that I agree with you.  And, I
> don't know of any reason why either approach (having the compiler supply
> a default segment name or changing the section attribute syntax) would
> not be possible.  Unless I'm misunderstanding the issues here, it seems
> to me that either change is beyond the scope of my patch, which is
> intending to restore support for named function sections in a manner
> that is consistent with named variable sections, and that appears to
> have been unintentionally removed.

I was responding specifically to the testsuite change; I don't think
that Darwin supports named sections from the POV of the testsuite
infrastructure.  For instance, look at the tests which actually
use dg-require-named-sections.  Looks to me like there are five of
them, one of which is specifically for -freorder-blocks-and-partition,
and the others all use section("name").  And would fail.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]