This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:03:23 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
- References: <1138617600.5717.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3acddlo09.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <1138714399.5680.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1138718247.5680.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0602052327270.290@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <43E682E9.601@avtrex.com>
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, David Daney wrote:
>> + <li>revalidate and repaint fixes which make Free Swing
>> + much more responsive.</li>
>> "Revalidate"?
> I don't know. 'revalidate' and 'repaint' are method names. Since java is
> case sensitive capitalizing seems a bit questionable.
That's more than just a bit questionable in that case, I guess. ;-)
I had thought these two were more general terms, not method names.
By marking this up as <code>revalidate</code> and <code>repaint</code>
we'd avoid any disambiguity.
Thanks for pointing this out, David!
Gerald