This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PATCH to gimplify.c for 25977 and 25979
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: "gcc-patches >> GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:38:34 -0500
- Subject: PATCH to gimplify.c for 25977 and 25979
These two PRs deal with different cases where we improperly use the LHS
of an assignment as the return slot for a call on the RHS.
In 25977, I assumed that the RETURN_DECL would always be safe, but this
is not the case if it is an NRV.
In 25979, looking through a *& caused us to wind up with a function
where the same object is both an argument (by reference) and a local
variable (by way of the RSO and NRVO). I think we can avoid this without
disabling the optimization entirely, but I've disabled it for now on the
basis that a wrong code regression is worse than a missed optimization
regression. I'll continue to look at this.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to 4.1 and trunk.
2006-02-03 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/25979
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Disable *& optimization for now.
PR middle-end/25977
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): It's not always safe to do RVO
on the return slot if it's an NRV.
Index: gimplify.c
===================================================================
*** gimplify.c (revision 110559)
--- gimplify.c (working copy)
*************** gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
*** 3190,3195 ****
--- 3190,3196 ----
while (ret != GS_UNHANDLED)
switch (TREE_CODE (*from_p))
{
+ #if 0
case INDIRECT_REF:
{
/* If we have code like
*************** gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
*** 3211,3216 ****
--- 3212,3218 ----
ret = GS_UNHANDLED;
break;
}
+ #endif
case TARGET_EXPR:
{
*************** gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
*** 3272,3279 ****
bool use_target;
if (TREE_CODE (*to_p) == RESULT_DECL
&& needs_to_live_in_memory (*to_p))
! /* It's always OK to use the return slot directly. */
use_target = true;
else if (!is_gimple_non_addressable (*to_p))
/* Don't use the original target if it's already addressable;
--- 3274,3282 ----
bool use_target;
if (TREE_CODE (*to_p) == RESULT_DECL
+ && DECL_NAME (*to_p) == NULL_TREE
&& needs_to_live_in_memory (*to_p))
! /* It's OK to use the return slot directly unless it's an NRV. */
use_target = true;
else if (!is_gimple_non_addressable (*to_p))
/* Don't use the original target if it's already addressable;
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv10.C
===================================================================
*** testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv10.C (revision 0)
--- testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv10.C (revision 0)
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,48 ----
+ // PR c++/25979
+ // Bug: we were eliding too many temporaries, so that a1 was used
+ // as both 'a' and 'x' in the second operator+.
+ // { dg-do run }
+
+ struct A
+ {
+ A() : data1_(0), data2_(0) {}
+ A(int i, int j) : data1_(i), data2_(j) {}
+ A operator+(int);
+ friend A operator+(int, const A&);
+ ~A() {}
+ //private:
+ int data1_;
+ int data2_;
+ };
+
+ extern bool x;
+
+ extern "C" void abort ();
+
+ int main()
+ {
+ A a1(1,2);
+ a1 = (x ? a1 + 3 : 3 + a1);
+ if (a1.data1_ != 3 || a1.data2_ != 2)
+ abort ();
+ }
+
+ bool x = false;
+
+ A
+ A::operator+(int i)
+ {
+ A a;
+ a = *this;
+ a.data2_ = i;
+ return a;
+ }
+
+ A
+ operator+(int i, const A& x)
+ {
+ A a;
+ a = x;
+ a.data1_ = i;
+ return a;
+ }
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv11.C
===================================================================
*** testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv11.C (revision 0)
--- testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv11.C (revision 0)
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,58 ----
+ // PR middle-end/25977
+ // Bug: We were assuming that the return slot of the current function is
+ // always safe to use as the return slot for another call, because its
+ // address cannot escape. But its address can escape if we perform the
+ // named return value optimization.
+
+ // { dg-do run }
+
+ struct A
+ {
+ A( int left, int top, int width, int height )
+ : x1(left), y1(top), x2(left+width-1), y2(top+height-1) {}
+
+ //A(const A& o) : x1(o.x1), y1(o.y1), x2(o.x2), y2(o.y2) {}
+ //A& operator=(const A& o ) { x1=o.x1; y1=o.y1; x2=o.x2; y2=o.y2; return *this; }
+
+ A operator&(const A &r) const
+ {
+ A tmp(0, 0, -1, -1);
+ tmp.x1 = ((r.x1) < (x1) ? (x1) : (r.x1));
+ tmp.x2 = ((x2) < (r.x2) ? (x2) : (r.x2));
+ tmp.y1 = ((r.y1) < (y1) ? (y1) : (r.y1));
+ tmp.y2 = ((y2) < (r.y2) ? (y2) : (r.y2));
+ return tmp;
+ }
+
+ int x1;
+ int y1;
+ int x2;
+ int y2;
+ };
+
+ bool operator==( const A &r1, const A &r2 )
+ {
+ return r1.x1==r2.x1 && r1.x2==r2.x2 && r1.y1==r2.y1 && r1.y2==r2.y2;
+ }
+
+ static A test()
+ {
+ A all = A( 0, 0, 1024, 768);
+ A a = all;
+ A r = all;
+ a = a & r;
+ return a;
+ }
+
+ extern "C" void abort(void);
+
+ int main( int argc, char ** argv )
+ {
+ A all = A( 0, 0, 1024, 768);
+ A a = test();
+
+ if ( ! ( a == all))
+ abort();
+
+ return 0;
+ }
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/opt/temp1.C
===================================================================
*** testsuite/g++.dg/opt/temp1.C (revision 110559)
--- testsuite/g++.dg/opt/temp1.C (working copy)
***************
*** 1,6 ****
// PR c++/16405
// { dg-options "-O2" }
! // { dg-do run }
// There should be exactly one temporary generated for the code in "f"
// below when optimizing -- for the result of "b + c". We have no
--- 1,6 ----
// PR c++/16405
// { dg-options "-O2" }
! // { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
// There should be exactly one temporary generated for the code in "f"
// below when optimizing -- for the result of "b + c". We have no