This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: Fix latent bug in tailcall
Daniel Berlin wrote:
> However, due to laziness, etc, they simply call update_ssa, which is an
> incredibly large hammer for what they are doing, and does a ton more work.
>
Yes, of course. But this is not news and we discussed it quite
thoroughly in the past.
I thought this was about the invalid SSA left after tailcall? The
over-reliance on update_ssa is something we still need to address.