This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:49:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127
References: <200511092231.04949.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200511100027.17786.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <m3acgdl7r6.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

> Well, I'm still thinking about cygwin.

Will that result in wrong code for Cygwin?  What if someone writes a SUS 
emulation layer on Cygwin?

> I see from the PR that this works with the Sun compiler because of
> #pragma unknown_control_flow.  That is, the information is not built
> into the Sun compiler, it is in a header file.  So I don't see why a
> fixincludes approach is insufficient.

Fixinclude silently breaks every now and while with new revisions of header 
files.  And we would need a super-generic fix for a bunch of platforms or a 
bunch of fixes.

Moreover that would be inconsistent with what we currently have.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/22127
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]