This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
Cc: GNU GFortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:48:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement
References: <20050923224524.GB19244@vipunen.hut.fi> <20050924085248.GC19244@vipunen.hut.fi> <20050924090618.GD19244@vipunen.hut.fi> <20050924124337.GA23932@meiner.onlinehome.de>

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:43:37PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:06:18PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > Sigh,
> > 
> > here the previous patch is in the recommended unified diff format.
> 
> Thanks, this is an important part that you are filling!
> 
> I am currently bootstrapping your patch in order to check it.
> I would appreciate, however, if you could provide a few test
> cases too, for the most important aspects (stride=1, stride /=1,
> stride = -1 for example).
> 

I bootstrapped and reg. tested the original patch last night.
There were no regressions on freebsd-*-i386.

-- 
Steve

References:
- [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [patch, fortran] Unformatted array IO performance improvement
  - From: Thomas Koenig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]