This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: expanding addrs for initializers

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: ebotcazou at adacore dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:13:22 -0700
Subject: Re: expanding addrs for initializers
References: <200508190348.j7J3mQa7007351@greed.delorie.com> <20050819194619.GF11768@redhat.com> <200509010203.j8123Ba7000797@greed.delorie.com> <200509181912.20573.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200509192000.j8JK0MCO022091@greed.delorie.com>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:00:22PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> So, rather than add exception after exception, let's just drop the
> check and go back to the way it was before.

Alternately, are we sure that we're not in fact catching bugs?
And that the Ada exceptions are in fact wrong?  No one but Eric
actually looked at those failures...

I like the idea of the check.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]