This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] patch for mingw

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:19:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran] patch for mingw
References: <43220979.7060408@gmail.com> <200509100116.02044.paul@codesourcery.com> <4322BE0E.4010107@gmail.com>

Attached patch adds the Windows version of cpu_time, conditionnal on __MINGW32__. Danny Smith said the patch was (except the part i fixed) OK for him: as a mingw maintainer, can his approval be enough for such patches (I will probably submit a few mingw-specific patches for libgfortran in the next few days) provided that I did regtest on linux and mingw? Or do I need explicit approval under the usual gfortran rules?

ping. Is that patch OK? Do you think I need explicit approval from gfortran reviewers for such patches, or is Danny's approval enough?

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] patch for mingw
  - From: FX Coudert

References:
- [gfortran] patch for mingw
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran] patch for mingw
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [gfortran] patch for mingw
  - From: FX Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]