Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534 contd contd

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>Hey Paolo. Good to see you back.
>
Hey!

>I agree, codegen and size issues are not the highest priority for the
>debug mode in general, as you say.
>
Ok.

>In the spirit of adventure, I have measured this.
>I've compiled all of 23/24/25 test cases with debug mode support on,
>with cvs and the patch. The sizes are attached. This is done with small
>modifications to the check-compile routines, which I will check in
>shortly.
>
>You'll find the size difference to be minimal to non-existent (I didn't
>see any difference). I believe this should satisfy your objection.
>  
>
Well, I would rather experiment with something much simpler and easy to
understand, like a simple program using a lot of times
string::operator[] in debug-mode (meaningful only in mainline, of
course, where debug-mode works for strings). Can you do that? Otherwise,
just let me know and I will take care of it, as soon as possible.

Paolo.