This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: --with-build-sysroot, et. al.
- From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: dj at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jul 2005 18:56:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: PATCH: --with-build-sysroot, et. al.
- References: <200507241939.j6OJdpaR004380@sethra.codesourcery.com> <m21x5nh20l.fsf@greed.local> <42E96B92.4040301@codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> > Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> >
> >>+ The GNU linker (beginning with version 2.16) has the necessary support
> >>+ for this option. If your linker does not support this option, the
> >>+ header file aspect of @option{--sysroot} will still work, but the
> >>+ library aspect will not.
> > This is a regression on Darwin; there, -isysroot already passes
> > -syslibroot to the linker.
>
> I didn't change anything about what -isysroot does; if on Darwin it
> has extra semantics, then it still should. Is that not true?
The regression is that now the documentation doesn't match the
implementation...