This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:18:38 -0400
Subject: Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
References: <200507271413.58736.paul@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010038580.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <1122850701.32467.39.camel@linux.site> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010059530.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 01:00 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > So, uh, fix it.
> > It probably took your 3x longer to write this message than it would have
> > to double click on the page and edit it.
> 
> You fail to see the educational value of (patch) reviews.

For most documentation?
Yes. 
All having patch review for most documentation does is make it so we
don't have up-to-date or useful docs.

Repeat after me:  Documentation is not code.

You fail to see the value of collaborative development for
documentation, while strangely, other projects have embraced it and have
*much* better documentation than we do.

> 
> Gerald

References:
- [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]