This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] fix pr22550

From: ja2morri at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca (James A. Morrison)
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:02:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr22550
References: <kfh4qajymrj.fsf@csclub.uwaterloo.ca><20050725155540.GA5702@topo.toronto.redhat.com><1122318323.8352.108.camel@localhost.localdomain><20050726131135.GA11939@topo.toronto.redhat.com><d772e74eb767e8dca9dcba687293664a@physics.uc.edu><20050726134431.GA10062@topo.toronto.redhat.com>

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I forgot about the third alternative, which is to just make
> optimizers handle no-op conditionals (as in James' original
> patch).
>
> Preferences?

 I did opt for this because it was simpler and I thought about using
vrp_evaluate_condition somewhere else and thought INTEGER_CST may show up there
as well.  Sorry for being vague here, I don't remember the details.

-- 
Thanks,
Jim

http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~ja2morri/
http://phython.blogspot.com
http://open.nit.ca/wiki/?page=jim

References:
- [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: James A. Morrison
- Re: [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [patch] fix pr22550
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]