[PATCH, committed] Fix flatten-1.c failures on x86_64

[Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>]

by adjusting function names.  Tested on i686 (where it worked before)
and x86_64 (where it didn't).  Asm label scanning is evil.

Committed as obvious.

Richard.


2005-07-25  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@gcc.gnu.org>

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/flatten-1.c: Use longer function names
	for matching of asm labels.

Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/flatten-1.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/flatten-1.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -c -3 -p -r1.2 flatten-1.c
*** gcc.dg/tree-ssa/flatten-1.c	21 Jul 2005 08:02:21 -0000	1.2
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/flatten-1.c	25 Jul 2005 14:49:36 -0000
*************** static int bar(int i)
*** 36,57 ****
  }
  
  
! static int g(int i)
  {
    return i*5+1;
  }
! static int f(int i)
  {
!   return g(i);
  }
  int __attribute__((flatten)) leaf3(int i)
  {
    int j;
!   j = f(i);
!   j += f(i);
    return j;
  }
  
- /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "g\[: \t\n\]" } } */
- /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "f\[: \t\n\]" } } */
  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bar\[: \t\n\]" } } */
--- 36,55 ----
  }
  
  
! static int gloobar(int i)
  {
    return i*5+1;
  }
! static int floobar(int i)
  {
!   return gloobar(i);
  }
  int __attribute__((flatten)) leaf3(int i)
  {
    int j;
!   j = floobar(i);
!   j += floobar(i);
    return j;
  }
  
  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bar\[: \t\n\]" } } */