This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch RFC] SH: -fstack-protector support
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Oops, sorry, you're right. Then s/n't// in md.texi should be done.
Will one of you post a patch for this or should I?
While we are at fixing this, shouldn't this grammatically be 'are equal'?
The values in memory are not changed by stack_protect_test.
Or we could say 'compared equal' if we want to emphasize that
the comparison has to be done first.
2005-07-20 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@st.com>
* doc/md.texi (stack_protect_test): Fix description of branch.
Index: doc/md.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/md.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.141
diff -p -r1.141 md.texi
*** doc/md.texi 20 Jul 2005 06:39:24 -0000 1.141
--- doc/md.texi 20 Jul 2005 15:46:11 -0000
*************** If this pattern is not defined, then a p
*** 4062,4068 ****
This pattern, if defined, compares a @code{Pmode} value from the
memory in operand 1 with the memory in operand 0 without leaving the
value in a register afterward and branches to operand 2 if the values
! weren't equal.
If this pattern is not defined, then a plain compare pattern and
conditional branch pattern is used.
--- 4062,4068 ----
This pattern, if defined, compares a @code{Pmode} value from the
memory in operand 1 with the memory in operand 0 without leaving the
value in a register afterward and branches to operand 2 if the values
! are equal.
If this pattern is not defined, then a plain compare pattern and
conditional branch pattern is used.